Andy Schmuckler: Who would kill for money? | my preference

Andy Schmuckler: Who would kill for money?  |  my preference

Evidence for the black spirit lies in this disturbing pattern:

When a large corporation, or an entire industry, discovers that the products it enriches are also killing people, it will choose to hide the truth, even though the people will die, so their profits will continue undiminished.

Three main cases are known:

• It has been proven in courts around the world that the asbestos industry knew that asbestos was slowly killing its workers. But they kept their information secret, did not protect their workers (which would have eaten into the profits), and instead let the workers unknowingly risk a terrible death, which many did.

• The tobacco industry – as the nation now knows – has waged a decades-old propaganda campaign to conceal the deadly effects of smoking. They calculated that by sowing false skepticism about hard facts, they could persuade many of their customers, who would otherwise have given up the habit, to continue buying their products. An industry that chooses to kill for money.

• Now comes what is by far the most important example of this pattern: the fossil fuel industry has known for more than 40 years that the consumption of its products has been threatening the stability of the Earth’s climate. But far from warning the surrounding world of this potentially catastrophic problem, they embarked on a decades-long campaign of lies to prevent America from taking urgently necessary action to protect the human future. They put their short-term profits on the lives of our children and grandchildren.

I asked a friend of mine, who has studied such things for decades, if there are examples of such corporate entities Not They chose to sacrifice the lives of others to avoid any harm to their profits, when faced with such choices. He said he was not aware of any instances in which some companies had chosen to do the right thing.

If this is true, as this evidence seems to suggest, that every time a corporate entity faced with this choice – whether to inject profits into the lives of others – made the choice to “kill for money”, we are compelled to conclude that the spirit of social greed permeates The corporate world in general.

It should be clear that as a society we need to transform the spirit that animates our corporate world. Who wants a spirit of social greed – willing to “kill for money” – a big say in how our society develops?

We need to ask: What can be done to make our corporate world one in which the common good is given due weight?

A good answer requires understanding the forces that shaped the corporate world that would choose the tobacco and asbestos industries as they did.

I don’t think this reflects human nature: only a small minority of people, I bet, faced in their individual lives with choices like those faced by industries, would choose to “kill for money”. (How many people do you know think would make this fatal choice?)

And if this were not “human nature”, then there must be systemic forces at work that render these great economic entities into something far less moral and benevolent than the humans from which they arose.

(It has been my life’s work to define different systemic dynamics that drive our civilization to evolve in ways we would not choose. The gist of what I have to say can be said: “The ugliness we see in human history is not a highly written human nature.”)

Regarding the question, “What systemic forces have made social greed control our institutional world”, I’m wondering:

• Does this unfortunate development begin with certain types of people who rise to positions of dominance in the corporate world? (I don’t think Rockefeller, Carnegie, and their ilk would have sacrificed the world as the fossil fuel industry did.)

• Is the system training people to be prepared to make such fatal choices?

• Is this due to the development of the corporate world within a system related to competition for markets?

• Do self-perpetuating councils tend to push their institutions deeper into social greed with the passing of generations?

• Do people take a different “breath” when working within the organization?

Can such dynamics be countered? Would it be possible, by various means, to change our nation’s corporate world so that – perhaps decades from now – it would give all due weight to the greater good?

not blame. Just the challenge of engineering the human world we need, with a corporate system that cares more deeply about the interests of the wider world, is not keeping score in a game played only for money.

And we must note: the problems with the corporate world of America are not limited to “kill for money”. Part of the corporate world itself was replacing American democracy with a plutocracy, governed by the power of money. United citizens are only one part of this takeover of the wealthy, as they transfer power from ordinary citizens to the already powerful corporate system.

Social greed and the drive for power over people: these are two historically known faces of evil.

The obligation to stand for good against what is evil in our world comes from the land of man.

Source link

Leave a Comment